<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>varnachitram &#187; T.Damodaran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://varnachitram.com/tag/tdamodaran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://varnachitram.com</link>
	<description>A Blog on Cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 01:08:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Creativity Drought</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2008/10/29/a-creativity-drought/</link>
		<comments>http://varnachitram.com/2008/10/29/a-creativity-drought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bharathan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I.V.Sasi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M.T.Vasudevan Nair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Padmarajan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.Damodaran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2008/10/29/a-creativity-drought/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conjecture is that the growth of tamizh and most other cinemas is what market-mechanism ensures when fueled by the inflow of money and the absence of impedance from AMMA-type gundaism. In contrast, the growth of malayALam cinema during 1980s &#8230; <a href="http://varnachitram.com/2008/10/29/a-creativity-drought/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The conjecture is that the growth of tamizh and most other cinemas is what market-mechanism ensures when fueled by the inflow of money and the absence of impedance from AMMA-type gundaism. In contrast, the growth of malayALam cinema during 1980s was due to the presence of a tiny bunch of talented, yet not other-worldly ( in the Aravindan/Adoor sense ) directors/technicians/actors &#8211; I mean bharatan, padmarAjan etc. &#8211; whose sheer talent and appeal were powerful enough to uplift an entire movie industry &#8211; in other words, it was rather fortuitous coincidence that this small bunch were born in Kerala and managed to get together. Once these people passed away/aged/entered a creativity-drought there was none left to pull the rest up, and things went back to where they would have been if the geniuses didn’t exist and unionism existed.[<a href="http://varnachitram.com/2008/10/28/indian-panorama-malayalam-movies-galore/#comment-100171">Indian Panorama - Malayalam movies galore</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>froginthewell <a href="http://varnachitram.com/2008/10/28/indian-panorama-malayalam-movies-galore/#comment-100171">asked that question</a> in the comments question about the golden age of Malayalam Cinema.</p>
<p>A lot of credit, as he rightly pointed out, goes to Bharatan and Padmarajan for uplifting the quality of Malayalam cinema. While Padmarajan was a writer as well as a director, Bharatan was not. Directors of those era were helped a lot by great scripts by  MT Vasudevan Nair, T Damodaran and later by Lohithadas. Directors like IV Sasi too made some excellent socially relevant movies during that period.</p>
<p>Later there was the Sreenivasan-Sathyan Anthikkad-Priyadarshan type comedy, which were dark and socially relevant. These movies did not fly above the head like various Adoor/Aravindan movies, but connected with people. People were able to idenitify with the protagonists and their issues.</p>
<p>Once Padmarajan died, MT stopped writing for a while, Priyadarshan discovered Hollywood movies and Sathyan Anthikkad became a master of cliches, the field was taken over by the Shaji Kailas, Shafi, Rafi-Mecartin types. Their movies were entertaining in one sense, but were repetitive and predictable.</p>
<p>Lohithadas too seems to have lost his mojo and the last standing writer of that era is Srinivasan who is able to churn out movies like <em>Katha Parayumbol</em>, which still connect with the masses.Right now a director like Lal Jose alone is able to churn out a hit film called <em>Oru Arabikatha</em> based on Iqbal Kuttipuram&#8217;s script with Srinivasan as the hero. This is rare.</p>
<p>Right now the superstars are into mindless comedy, super man movies. Producers too want only them because they have a minimum guarantee. Hopefully a bunch of great talent will burst out &#8211; the souls of Bharatan and Padmarajan would have reincarnated somewhere &#8212; and save us from Anil-Babu and the likes.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"></script><fb:like href="http://varnachitram.com/2008/10/29/a-creativity-drought/" send="true" layout="standard" width="450" show_faces="true" colorscheme="light" action="like" font=""></fb:like>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://varnachitram.com/2008/10/29/a-creativity-drought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

