<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for varnachitram</title>
	<atom:link href="http://varnachitram.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://varnachitram.com</link>
	<description>A Blog on Cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:38:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Comedy Movies &#8211; Part 1 by Mani</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/04/20/top-10-comedy-movies-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-168375</link>
		<dc:creator>Mani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/04/20/top-10-comedy-movies-part-1/#comment-168375</guid>
		<description>Namaskaaram!

The list has movies from another era altogether.

Would somebody like to share their most liked comedy movies of the 21st century?

Let me start ....

1. Meeshamadhavan
2. Hariharnagar 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Namaskaaram!</p>
<p>The list has movies from another era altogether.</p>
<p>Would somebody like to share their most liked comedy movies of the 21st century?</p>
<p>Let me start &#8230;.</p>
<p>1. Meeshamadhavan<br />
2. Hariharnagar 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review roundup: Palery Manikyam by abhilash</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2009/12/06/review-roundup-paleri-manikyam/comment-page-1/#comment-168288</link>
		<dc:creator>abhilash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/?p=975#comment-168288</guid>
		<description>Shyam, thanks for the support.

Sara, Agree with most of what you are saying, particularly about the acting.

I agree that there should be more movies that accept the sexual reality of life. But I don&#039;t think &#039;sensuality&#039; is a very real life entity to merit an urgent place in movies.

And I didn&#039;t carry a notepad. I was a little disappointed with the movie, probably because I had high expectations (was expecting something on the scale of Pavithran&#039;s Utharam). At the time I saw the film, practically all of the reports on the net were gloating it up like a 10/10 flick. So I thought I would vocalise my disappointment too. Though not very good, Palery certainly is better than most of the films that graced Kerala screens since then, including MNIK. 

I had to put in the details, because I didn&#039;t want to look like bashing a well liked movie blindly. I think I wasn&#039;t nitpicking because if I were I would have highlighted things like the fact that most of the men in March - April of 1957 were seen wearing shirts outdoors etc.. Just said about a few things which looked rather obvious and uncomfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shyam, thanks for the support.</p>
<p>Sara, Agree with most of what you are saying, particularly about the acting.</p>
<p>I agree that there should be more movies that accept the sexual reality of life. But I don&#8217;t think &#8217;sensuality&#8217; is a very real life entity to merit an urgent place in movies.</p>
<p>And I didn&#8217;t carry a notepad. I was a little disappointed with the movie, probably because I had high expectations (was expecting something on the scale of Pavithran&#8217;s Utharam). At the time I saw the film, practically all of the reports on the net were gloating it up like a 10/10 flick. So I thought I would vocalise my disappointment too. Though not very good, Palery certainly is better than most of the films that graced Kerala screens since then, including MNIK. </p>
<p>I had to put in the details, because I didn&#8217;t want to look like bashing a well liked movie blindly. I think I wasn&#8217;t nitpicking because if I were I would have highlighted things like the fact that most of the men in March &#8211; April of 1957 were seen wearing shirts outdoors etc.. Just said about a few things which looked rather obvious and uncomfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review roundup: Palery Manikyam by Sara</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2009/12/06/review-roundup-paleri-manikyam/comment-page-1/#comment-168249</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/?p=975#comment-168249</guid>
		<description>Saw &quot;Paleri Manikyam&quot;,felt good after watching it.Gave me a lot to think about!! Then I read a few reviews to see what others felt.But nothing matches what Abhilash has written here.He has done it in such detail, that makes me wonder if he went to the movie with a notepad.I was jealous that most of you saw the movie way back in December and I had to wait for so long.
 
When I read the movie was based on a real incident,I am curious to know how much of reality is presented in the movie? And what are the writer&#039;s/director&#039;s add ons?

I understand the fact that Haridas(Mammooty)was Ahmed Haaji&#039;s son,so wouldn&#039;t it have been more believable,if he just came back to Paleri to find out if his father was still living? And later get intrigued by Manikyam&#039;s murder, coz he is sure to hear about it from the people.It led me to wonder if this was narrated by Haridas in the Novel too,if so  how it was done.

Have to applaud the movie makers for adding some extra ordinary new actors. 

Even though I hated the climax,I can let go of the fact that Mammooty plays both Ahmed Haaji and Khalid ,but Haridas too (and none of the people who knew Haaji seem to have a problem with it!!!)Was it Mammoty&#039;s desperate effort to balance out the negative character of Ahmed Haaji ? Is he scared to play a villain?

Sarayu,was a character that had so much potential if handled well. She was never there even while she was in the frame often.Her relationship with Haridas had to be much more intense than that.And there is no way she would have gone back with just a call from her husband.Why was she smoking?

Loved Swetha Menon(Cheeru),she was just amazing!!!The director gets points for choosing a bold topic,when most of his contemporaries are trying to play it safe.

Sensuality is beautiful if portrayed well like a poem .I guess now is the right time to make more movies which depict sex and sensuality.Don&#039;t you think its high time our society gets educated? How many more suicides will it take to realize the need to loose our hypocrisy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw &#8220;Paleri Manikyam&#8221;,felt good after watching it.Gave me a lot to think about!! Then I read a few reviews to see what others felt.But nothing matches what Abhilash has written here.He has done it in such detail, that makes me wonder if he went to the movie with a notepad.I was jealous that most of you saw the movie way back in December and I had to wait for so long.</p>
<p>When I read the movie was based on a real incident,I am curious to know how much of reality is presented in the movie? And what are the writer&#8217;s/director&#8217;s add ons?</p>
<p>I understand the fact that Haridas(Mammooty)was Ahmed Haaji&#8217;s son,so wouldn&#8217;t it have been more believable,if he just came back to Paleri to find out if his father was still living? And later get intrigued by Manikyam&#8217;s murder, coz he is sure to hear about it from the people.It led me to wonder if this was narrated by Haridas in the Novel too,if so  how it was done.</p>
<p>Have to applaud the movie makers for adding some extra ordinary new actors. </p>
<p>Even though I hated the climax,I can let go of the fact that Mammooty plays both Ahmed Haaji and Khalid ,but Haridas too (and none of the people who knew Haaji seem to have a problem with it!!!)Was it Mammoty&#8217;s desperate effort to balance out the negative character of Ahmed Haaji ? Is he scared to play a villain?</p>
<p>Sarayu,was a character that had so much potential if handled well. She was never there even while she was in the frame often.Her relationship with Haridas had to be much more intense than that.And there is no way she would have gone back with just a call from her husband.Why was she smoking?</p>
<p>Loved Swetha Menon(Cheeru),she was just amazing!!!The director gets points for choosing a bold topic,when most of his contemporaries are trying to play it safe.</p>
<p>Sensuality is beautiful if portrayed well like a poem .I guess now is the right time to make more movies which depict sex and sensuality.Don&#8217;t you think its high time our society gets educated? How many more suicides will it take to realize the need to loose our hypocrisy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thilakan Saga continues by mani</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2010/02/25/thilakan-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-168235</link>
		<dc:creator>mani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/?p=1118#comment-168235</guid>
		<description>lol davis..this is probably the funniest comment i have read in VC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol davis..this is probably the funniest comment i have read in VC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on India&#8217;s first digital movie by Prasan Sinha</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/06/15/indias-first-digital-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-168225</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasan Sinha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/06/15/indias-first-digital-movie/#comment-168225</guid>
		<description>Dear friends, this to inform you all that First Hindi Digital Feature Film: KIMET - Ek Anokha Moad has been Produced by VISION Q INCORPORATE, Mumbai &amp; was Premiered internationally at 62nd Cannes Film Festival 2009 at India Pavilion on May16, 2009 which was witnessed by lots of Indian &amp; Foreign Filmmakers, Distributors &amp; other Media Personalities. It is a recorded fact &amp; any body can check it up.The Film was selected by the Ministry of I &amp; B, Govt. of India under ASSOCHEM which organized the India Pavilion at Cannes Film Festival, 2009. Now some Alt Entertainment, a Production House is claiming its Film LSD as the First Hindi Digital Feature Film which is absolutely wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear friends, this to inform you all that First Hindi Digital Feature Film: KIMET &#8211; Ek Anokha Moad has been Produced by VISION Q INCORPORATE, Mumbai &amp; was Premiered internationally at 62nd Cannes Film Festival 2009 at India Pavilion on May16, 2009 which was witnessed by lots of Indian &amp; Foreign Filmmakers, Distributors &amp; other Media Personalities. It is a recorded fact &amp; any body can check it up.The Film was selected by the Ministry of I &amp; B, Govt. of India under ASSOCHEM which organized the India Pavilion at Cannes Film Festival, 2009. Now some Alt Entertainment, a Production House is claiming its Film LSD as the First Hindi Digital Feature Film which is absolutely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thilakan Saga continues by Sk</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2010/02/25/thilakan-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-168091</link>
		<dc:creator>Sk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/?p=1118#comment-168091</guid>
		<description>Thilakan, who alleges lobbies based on castes like Nair lobby and Muslim lobby, should have  rejected his  role in a casteist movie like &#039;nasrani sahodaranmar&#039; before he was avoided from the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thilakan, who alleges lobbies based on castes like Nair lobby and Muslim lobby, should have  rejected his  role in a casteist movie like &#8216;nasrani sahodaranmar&#8217; before he was avoided from the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Perumazhakkalam by Anand</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/03/04/review-perumazhakkalam/comment-page-1/#comment-168043</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/03/04/review-perumazhakkalam/#comment-168043</guid>
		<description>I had the chance to watch this movie only recently. The cinematography and sounds of the movie are good. The actors are all brilliant, especially Meera. She is a real talent. What comes through as poor is the director&#039;s aesthetics. Although above average, the way Kamal has visualized some of the scenes is very mediocre. 

The music is good. Except for &quot;raakilithan&quot;, the other two songs in the movie are unnecessary. 

Overall I found the film as worth watching for the actors, but direction falls several miles short of what Kamal is capable of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the chance to watch this movie only recently. The cinematography and sounds of the movie are good. The actors are all brilliant, especially Meera. She is a real talent. What comes through as poor is the director&#8217;s aesthetics. Although above average, the way Kamal has visualized some of the scenes is very mediocre. </p>
<p>The music is good. Except for &#8220;raakilithan&#8221;, the other two songs in the movie are unnecessary. </p>
<p>Overall I found the film as worth watching for the actors, but direction falls several miles short of what Kamal is capable of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
