<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Kathavaseshan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/</link>
	<description>A Blog on Cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/comment-page-1/#comment-144816</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/#comment-144816</guid>
		<description>for the shame of being alive...

Perhaps, life is not that easy and simple for those who realize and analyze their day to day life and surroundings.

kathavaseshan begins with, the protagonist, Gopinath (played by Dileep), an engineer by profession, gets up in the morning as every one does, freshens himself up, reads the daily news paper and commits suicide. In fact, here he cannot be considered as the protagonist as he is not leading he plot, which instead is carried by the stories about him, told by those who were near to him. So, after the first scene the protagonist is dead and only the stories about him survive and this explains the title. From the stories narrated by his uncle, sister, so many old friends who had worked and walked with him, The girl with whom he was in love for a long period, a thief, a police officer, a driver, his servant and a camera man we learn that the hero was a very ordinary human, politically active, sensitive to his surroundings and behaved adequately to situations. This is significant in a society where people are becoming more and more self oriented. This reminds me of an incident that happened in Kerala a few years back. A mad man killed another man, by holding his head under water, while so many people were watching. No one from the spectators responded and some guys even took the photographs and were published in next day&#039;s news paper.

The director knows that he is trying to provoke a numb society, inactive in all kinds of social action and thought. T. V.Chandran, had done this earlier in films like Susanna and Danny. I very much like his movie language and his method of composing shots. Most of the acting appears to be so artificial and that is deliberate too, for a plot like this. The movie is set as an investigation to the reasons behind his suicide, carried out by his fiancée portrayed here by Jyothirmayee. All characters and incidents revolve around this investigation and take us to the final scene, where we are told the reason for his suicide, and we (at least those who think) admit that we do feel the same shame and helplessness in many occasions in our life. (I don&#039;t think i am revealing a plot point here as the director himself had revealed it before the releasing of the movie, in his interviews.) This movie is also significant in other way as well, that is Kerala, though it is called as the God&#039;s own country, happens to be the place where highest number of suicides are recorded each year. 


an interesting review by Roby Kurian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the shame of being alive&#8230;</p>
<p>Perhaps, life is not that easy and simple for those who realize and analyze their day to day life and surroundings.</p>
<p>kathavaseshan begins with, the protagonist, Gopinath (played by Dileep), an engineer by profession, gets up in the morning as every one does, freshens himself up, reads the daily news paper and commits suicide. In fact, here he cannot be considered as the protagonist as he is not leading he plot, which instead is carried by the stories about him, told by those who were near to him. So, after the first scene the protagonist is dead and only the stories about him survive and this explains the title. From the stories narrated by his uncle, sister, so many old friends who had worked and walked with him, The girl with whom he was in love for a long period, a thief, a police officer, a driver, his servant and a camera man we learn that the hero was a very ordinary human, politically active, sensitive to his surroundings and behaved adequately to situations. This is significant in a society where people are becoming more and more self oriented. This reminds me of an incident that happened in Kerala a few years back. A mad man killed another man, by holding his head under water, while so many people were watching. No one from the spectators responded and some guys even took the photographs and were published in next day&#8217;s news paper.</p>
<p>The director knows that he is trying to provoke a numb society, inactive in all kinds of social action and thought. T. V.Chandran, had done this earlier in films like Susanna and Danny. I very much like his movie language and his method of composing shots. Most of the acting appears to be so artificial and that is deliberate too, for a plot like this. The movie is set as an investigation to the reasons behind his suicide, carried out by his fiancée portrayed here by Jyothirmayee. All characters and incidents revolve around this investigation and take us to the final scene, where we are told the reason for his suicide, and we (at least those who think) admit that we do feel the same shame and helplessness in many occasions in our life. (I don&#8217;t think i am revealing a plot point here as the director himself had revealed it before the releasing of the movie, in his interviews.) This movie is also significant in other way as well, that is Kerala, though it is called as the God&#8217;s own country, happens to be the place where highest number of suicides are recorded each year. </p>
<p>an interesting review by Roby Kurian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Kaiyoppu &#124; varnachitram</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/comment-page-1/#comment-122265</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Kaiyoppu &#124; varnachitram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/#comment-122265</guid>
		<description>[...] in such movies you don&#8217;t spring up a surprise, like in the climax of a CBI movie. In fact in Kathavaseshan , T K Chandran did a better job in justifying Dileep&#8217;s behavior, to the point of making it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in such movies you don&#8217;t spring up a surprise, like in the climax of a CBI movie. In fact in Kathavaseshan , T K Chandran did a better job in justifying Dileep&#8217;s behavior, to the point of making it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/comment-page-1/#comment-52303</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/#comment-52303</guid>
		<description>This film proves that Dileep cannot act.

Nice sript and direction.

But Dileep was horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This film proves that Dileep cannot act.</p>
<p>Nice sript and direction.</p>
<p>But Dileep was horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jithesh TR</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/comment-page-1/#comment-10573</link>
		<dc:creator>Jithesh TR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/#comment-10573</guid>
		<description>&quot;Menon does not think for a moment and goes and shouts...&quot; â€“ hey! I disagree with you here. (Looks like you hate &quot;thieves&quot;ïŠ :-) ). Menon went with the thief because he believed that the policeman has stolen thiefâ€™s properties and there wasnâ€™t anyone to help the thief! Also, the director shows that the thief is a product of the society! There is no anomaly in the justification.
&quot;We could not believe that this movie was made by the same director who made Padom Onnu: Ou Vilapam.&quot; â€“ Probably the director didnâ€™t want to be cliched! :-)
&quot;In this movie, we could not understand Gopinatha Menon...&quot; â€“ Gopinath Menon had very strong view points. He believed in actions, his decisions were spontaneous, and hence his character. And he was an ordinary man with flesh and blood! :-)
&quot;We could not fathom how such a man would commit suicide at the end. If we had seen a slow decline in his faith in society, it would have been a bit more logical, but no such attempt is made.&quot; â€“ Menonâ€™s character justifies his suicide. I think, the director is conveying &quot;what he could not do&quot; through Menon.
&quot;That said, there are some brilliant moments in T.V.Chandranâ€™s screenplay&quot; â€“ Yes, the screenplay is very brilliant! The way the director walks us through the minds of all those who are there in the screen! Lots to learn from the film!
&quot;There are some ridiculous scenes as well. Renuka once goes to an agency which specializes in investigating suicides&quot; â€“ Yes, these are very dramatic. Shows, how people can live on suicides! :-) Employees of that investigating agency get money (yes, indirectly) out of suicides!
&quot;Still we felt this was a dishonest and artificial film and hope...&quot; â€“ I disagree!

I do not intend to offend you by these comments, but am trying to justify the movie from my perspective. Thanks.

PS. Kindly ignore the smilies. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Menon does not think for a moment and goes and shouts&#8230;&#8221; â€“ hey! I disagree with you here. (Looks like you hate &#8220;thieves&#8221;ïŠ <img src='http://varnachitram.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). Menon went with the thief because he believed that the policeman has stolen thiefâ€™s properties and there wasnâ€™t anyone to help the thief! Also, the director shows that the thief is a product of the society! There is no anomaly in the justification.<br />
&#8220;We could not believe that this movie was made by the same director who made Padom Onnu: Ou Vilapam.&#8221; â€“ Probably the director didnâ€™t want to be cliched! <img src='http://varnachitram.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
&#8220;In this movie, we could not understand Gopinatha Menon&#8230;&#8221; â€“ Gopinath Menon had very strong view points. He believed in actions, his decisions were spontaneous, and hence his character. And he was an ordinary man with flesh and blood! <img src='http://varnachitram.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
&#8220;We could not fathom how such a man would commit suicide at the end. If we had seen a slow decline in his faith in society, it would have been a bit more logical, but no such attempt is made.&#8221; â€“ Menonâ€™s character justifies his suicide. I think, the director is conveying &#8220;what he could not do&#8221; through Menon.<br />
&#8220;That said, there are some brilliant moments in T.V.Chandranâ€™s screenplay&#8221; â€“ Yes, the screenplay is very brilliant! The way the director walks us through the minds of all those who are there in the screen! Lots to learn from the film!<br />
&#8220;There are some ridiculous scenes as well. Renuka once goes to an agency which specializes in investigating suicides&#8221; â€“ Yes, these are very dramatic. Shows, how people can live on suicides! <img src='http://varnachitram.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Employees of that investigating agency get money (yes, indirectly) out of suicides!<br />
&#8220;Still we felt this was a dishonest and artificial film and hope&#8230;&#8221; â€“ I disagree!</p>
<p>I do not intend to offend you by these comments, but am trying to justify the movie from my perspective. Thanks.</p>
<p>PS. Kindly ignore the smilies. <img src='http://varnachitram.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 4 Movies</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/comment-page-1/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 4 Movies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>[...] varnachitram reviews: Seelabathi, Kathavaseshan, Kanne Madanguka, Achanurangatha Veedu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] varnachitram reviews: Seelabathi, Kathavaseshan, Kanne Madanguka, Achanurangatha Veedu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stars - Producers!</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stars - Producers!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>[...] Often, we have seen our movie stars donning the mantle of producers. They do it for various reasons - some of them wanted to make the movie they always had in their mind. Some needed that ever elusive award, accompanying exposure in festival circuit and international acclaim like Vanaprastham and Kathavaseshan. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Often, we have seen our movie stars donning the mantle of producers. They do it for various reasons &#8211; some of them wanted to make the movie they always had in their mind. Some needed that ever elusive award, accompanying exposure in festival circuit and international acclaim like Vanaprastham and Kathavaseshan. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishnu</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishnu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/07/07/review-kathavaseshan/#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>Heh! The &quot;Suicide Investigator&quot; was brilliant too. The guy looked like that psychiatrist Mathew Vellore. I did not understand that part at all. 

I agree with what you say about all those incidents. Same type of incidents over and over again. The incident of the Andhra guy, where he leaves his daughter&#039;s dead body with Dilip and attends the wedding, looked very weird. Would anyone do that??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh! The &#8220;Suicide Investigator&#8221; was brilliant too. The guy looked like that psychiatrist Mathew Vellore. I did not understand that part at all. </p>
<p>I agree with what you say about all those incidents. Same type of incidents over and over again. The incident of the Andhra guy, where he leaves his daughter&#8217;s dead body with Dilip and attends the wedding, looked very weird. Would anyone do that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

