<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review &#8211; Udayananu Tharam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/</link>
	<description>A Blog on Cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/comment-page-1/#comment-147191</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/#comment-147191</guid>
		<description>Roshan Andrews was the film director.

He didn&#039;t produce...

This was his first film...his debut.


I can see the similarity to Bowfinger...
but not the other film.

The beginning of the film, the life and situation of Udayan, was from Roshan&#039;s own life probably. The story of the AD dreaming to be a filmmaker. 

This film was a satire of Malayalam cinema, that was its main purpose. And at the end of the film, at the climax, Sreenivasan might have gotten inspired through Bowfinger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roshan Andrews was the film director.</p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t produce&#8230;</p>
<p>This was his first film&#8230;his debut.</p>
<p>I can see the similarity to Bowfinger&#8230;<br />
but not the other film.</p>
<p>The beginning of the film, the life and situation of Udayan, was from Roshan&#8217;s own life probably. The story of the AD dreaming to be a filmmaker. </p>
<p>This film was a satire of Malayalam cinema, that was its main purpose. And at the end of the film, at the climax, Sreenivasan might have gotten inspired through Bowfinger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joemon</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/comment-page-1/#comment-147061</link>
		<dc:creator>Joemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/#comment-147061</guid>
		<description>Well, true that the movie itself is lifted from Hollywood movies but not from just one. I guess the producer Roshan Andrews must have made a frantic search for &quot;Movie about Movies&quot; and must have zeroed in on the following two movies
1: Bowfinger - from which the lack of talent, starring unknowingly, climax may have been copied
2: Big Fat Liar - from which the concept of stealing / plagiarism may have been lifted. 

I think the first part of Udayananu thaaram resembles Big Fat Liar. The second part especially the climax is an exact reproduction of Bowfinger.

All that Roshan Andrews and Srinivasan have done is that they have made it a mallu movie - transfomed it from Hollywood to Mollywood, adding a bit of masala - jokes about mallu actors.

So, Roshan Andrews is another Rajappan Thengummoode? Or is it that this is a film on himself, his own action of stealing from Hollywood made into a movie ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, true that the movie itself is lifted from Hollywood movies but not from just one. I guess the producer Roshan Andrews must have made a frantic search for &#8220;Movie about Movies&#8221; and must have zeroed in on the following two movies<br />
1: Bowfinger &#8211; from which the lack of talent, starring unknowingly, climax may have been copied<br />
2: Big Fat Liar &#8211; from which the concept of stealing / plagiarism may have been lifted. </p>
<p>I think the first part of Udayananu thaaram resembles Big Fat Liar. The second part especially the climax is an exact reproduction of Bowfinger.</p>
<p>All that Roshan Andrews and Srinivasan have done is that they have made it a mallu movie &#8211; transfomed it from Hollywood to Mollywood, adding a bit of masala &#8211; jokes about mallu actors.</p>
<p>So, Roshan Andrews is another Rajappan Thengummoode? Or is it that this is a film on himself, his own action of stealing from Hollywood made into a movie ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/comment-page-1/#comment-54132</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/#comment-54132</guid>
		<description>That movie would have been a disaster if Dileep had done it. Srinivasan is right on the money there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That movie would have been a disaster if Dileep had done it. Srinivasan is right on the money there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vishnu</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/comment-page-1/#comment-54078</link>
		<dc:creator>vishnu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/#comment-54078</guid>
		<description>about the bit with mohanlal getting furious on pappadam bit,i don&#039;t think so....there is a scene in the film in which he sees an &quot;achar&quot; ad which has saroj kumar&#039;s face definitely making a poke on the actor....also in another stone he throws stone on a billboard which is another jab on mohanal&#039;s &quot;karna&quot; drama.

Also,the fim was entirely sricpted early on that if &quot;pappadam scene&quot; was there, he definitely would have known it...

Moreover, jagathy has publically stated in an interview that he aggreed to participate in the film onlywhen he heard of lal&#039;s participation.... 

About the casting, at firstthe role was given to lal, who also intended to produce the film under a new banner at the time....butit didn&#039;t went through and lal was busy with other projects that it even to went to &quot;Dileep&quot;which sreenivasan mentioned in an interview as a shamefu happening. However after a long time, Jayaram landed on the role. By the time, lal was free and when he heard of the film&#039;s proceeding asked jayaram if he could do the film which jayaram acknowledged...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about the bit with mohanlal getting furious on pappadam bit,i don&#8217;t think so&#8230;.there is a scene in the film in which he sees an &#8220;achar&#8221; ad which has saroj kumar&#8217;s face definitely making a poke on the actor&#8230;.also in another stone he throws stone on a billboard which is another jab on mohanal&#8217;s &#8220;karna&#8221; drama.</p>
<p>Also,the fim was entirely sricpted early on that if &#8220;pappadam scene&#8221; was there, he definitely would have known it&#8230;</p>
<p>Moreover, jagathy has publically stated in an interview that he aggreed to participate in the film onlywhen he heard of lal&#8217;s participation&#8230;. </p>
<p>About the casting, at firstthe role was given to lal, who also intended to produce the film under a new banner at the time&#8230;.butit didn&#8217;t went through and lal was busy with other projects that it even to went to &#8220;Dileep&#8221;which sreenivasan mentioned in an interview as a shamefu happening. However after a long time, Jayaram landed on the role. By the time, lal was free and when he heard of the film&#8217;s proceeding asked jayaram if he could do the film which jayaram acknowledged&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interview : Manian Pillai Raju - Part II</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/comment-page-1/#comment-37902</link>
		<dc:creator>varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interview : Manian Pillai Raju - Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/#comment-37902</guid>
		<description>[...] Udayananu Tharam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Udayananu Tharam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review: Notebook</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/comment-page-1/#comment-31059</link>
		<dc:creator>varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review: Notebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/#comment-31059</guid>
		<description>[...] Udayananu Tharam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Udayananu Tharam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Page from Mejo&#8217;s Musical Notebook</title>
		<link>http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/comment-page-1/#comment-14006</link>
		<dc:creator>varnachitram &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Page from Mejo&#8217;s Musical Notebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://varnachitram.com/2006/02/17/review-udayananu-tharam/#comment-14006</guid>
		<description>[...] Udayananu Tharam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Udayananu Tharam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

